5 Comments

Totally agree. After living in rural Vermont for almost 30 years, I moved to a walkable city neighborhood in Portland, OR and have found it so much easier to walk everywhere and interact with people. In my lovely rural setting in VT, walking on roads (not hiking trails - which requires 20-30 minutes in theccar- or bushwhacking in the woods) almost always involves cars and trucks rushing by and spraying gravel, and much more danger of being run into than in the city, where a a sidewalk means I am clearly separated from traffic. Also so many things to see as I walk - very different from the spectacular natural views of my walks in the country, but changeable and human scale. And finally, aside from a wave at a passing car, the country offers far fewer chance encounters and conversations with people I don't know. In the city there is so much low level pleasant interaction, chatting about dogs, praising gardens, etc...

Expand full comment

…have you, personally, ever lived in an extremely rural area for an extended period of time?

Expand full comment

Top

Expand full comment

Brilliant:

"But it’s worth noting, Frodo and Sam live in the village, not out on isolated farms. The differences between a village, town, and city are differences of degree, not of kind. A city like San Francisco is a mosaic of neighborhoods, where each neighborhood is an urban village in itself."

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Sep 4Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Nitpicking this, about 2.5% of US population lives in NYC.

Expand full comment